Review Summary

Verdict: APPROVE

Findings

No issues found. Code looks correct and follows project conventions.

Details checked:

• The new Step 3 (investigation findings gate) in Case B is correctly inserted between the human gate (Step 2) and branch checkout (now Step 4), with step numbering updated consistently through Step 5.
• Case A step numbering (1–5) is unaffected.
• The intent classification blocks in both Case A and Case B are correctly collapsed to single-principle sentences that preserve all four response categories (unconditional approval, conditions/questions, fresh start where applicable, abandonment).
• The complexity scale removal is clean — no other section referenced or depended on those definitions.
• The resolution writing rules removal in submit-for-review is safe — the inline template example already demonstrates the desired style (plain language, 1–3 sentences, non-technical audience), and the one actionable rule (#N form) is preserved.
• The unconditional "Resuming work" comment is removed and replaced by the conditional investigation findings gate, matching the PR description.
• All four adapter outputs (.claude, .agents, .cursor, .gemini) are synced with updated hashes for both start and submit-for-review.